http://www.supaproofread.com/blog/wikipedia-fact-or-opinion/ For Students, Researchers, Business Professionals and Writers Sun, 02 Oct 2011 04:28:58 +0000 hourly 1 http://www.supaproofread.com/blog/wikipedia-fact-or-opinion/comment-page-1/#comment-735 Karyn Wed, 29 Dec 2010 14:45:12 +0000 http://www.supaproofread.com/blog/?p=279#comment-735 I agree and then some regarding the "facts" presented on Wilkpedia! I'm studying herbal remedies and upon looking up CalMag (a calcium-magnesium supplement) on Wilkpedia, I noted what appeared to be biased opinion disquised in the form of facts coming from a "credible source". It said how controvercial and potentially dangerous these methods are (anything can be dangerous...ask the FDA!), and how unlikelkely it was that people who reported to benefit from them actually did. While the listing was filled w/these types of innuendo, it totally left out some very important real facts, like, people have been successfully using these methods to heal various afflictions since time began and that science proves their efficacy over and over again! I was dissapointed and rather shocked to see all the drawbacks but none of the benefits listed. I agree and then some regarding the “facts” presented on Wilkpedia! I’m studying herbal remedies and upon looking up CalMag (a calcium-magnesium supplement) on Wilkpedia, I noted what appeared to be biased opinion disquised in the form of facts coming from a “credible source”. It said how controvercial and potentially dangerous these methods are (anything can be dangerous…ask the FDA!), and how unlikelkely it was that people who reported to benefit from them actually did. While the listing was filled w/these types of innuendo, it totally left out some very important real facts, like, people have been successfully using these methods to heal various afflictions since time began and that science proves their efficacy over and over again! I was dissapointed and rather shocked to see all the drawbacks but none of the benefits listed.

]]>