January
17th

Big Deal Update and Creative Insomnia

Filed under: Advice for Authors and Writers — ERH @ 7:35 am

Big Deal Update

I posted how I was going after a large contract worth some £30,000 every 18 months (for Michael that’s $60,000). After being whittled down to the last two, I learned yesterday that I had passed the writing test that had been set.

I’m now on my way to getting onto the company panel and my competitor for the assignments is no longer competing - both of us are going to be going on the panel; it will be a toss up as to who gets the first country assignments but there is apparently work for all.

It is not yet official but the finish line is definitely in sight.

Insomnia

I’ve suffered (or benefited) from insomnia for almost all my adult life. I can’t sleep in hotels unless I’ve been there for a week, sleeping over at friends on New Year’s Eve resulted in me walking home at 3am and occasionally, as with last night, I just don’t sleep at all.

Not to be put off, 4am in the morning is a good time to set things down on paper and there is nothing to disturb you - not even a mouse as I laid traps last week and caught them - the joy of country living. The issue is that the following day you are completely useless for anything productive so I try to avoid anything that gives me that “wide awake” feeling.

The number one culprit for my insomnia is thinking; once I have a thread revolving around the little grey cells, I’m away and there is no way I’m off to the Big Black as Spike Milligan referred to sleep.  My fellow insomniacs will be all to familiar with the “spinning mind syndrome” and it feels just like that.  Indeed, I read some research recently,  performed in New Zealand on 11 year old children and they found that it was the creative kids who were the ones that would suffer from sleeplessness.  This was a little surprising as creativity is one of the first brain faculties to be inhibited due to lack of sleep.

Over the years I have tried everything from sleeping pills, herbal remedies, hot milk and cookies, crossword puzzles and leaving a TV on with a sleep timer.  I find that the best way to cure the spinning mind syndrome is a notebook and pencil by the side of the bed - jotting the ideas down seems to be the best way of switching my brain off while my thoughts are still down on paper for the morning.

Failing that a good stiff Bowmore and a paracetamol.

Sweet Dreams :)

 

January
15th

Difficulty with Words and Spellings - All for Fun

Filed under: Fun with Writing — ERH @ 4:26 pm

Have you ever had to reach for the dictionary with word block and felt like kicking yourself when you found the result?

I had this with “could” last week; for the life of me I “cud” not remember how to spell it and looked it up and booked an appointment for an Alzheimer’s test.

It happens to all of us but the following are the ones I frequently come across:

DIARRHEA

Dash In A Real Rush, Hurry or Else Accident

CONSCIENCE

Remember it as Science with a Con

DESERT or DESSERT

The Sahara only has one S in it - Desserts have SugarS

ECZEMA

Even Clean ZEalots MAy get spots

There is no X in this word - Simon Cowell has no Zits!

HAEMORRHAGE

Help, Accident, EMergency! - Often Ruins Routine Hospital Appointments -

don’t forget to add the G and E on the end!

POTASSIUM

One Tea and two Sugars Please !

SUPERSEDE

The only word in the English language to end in -sede; the rest are -cede.

THERE or THEIR

Visualise directions for “there” - HERE and THERE!

For their, think possession - The HEIRs inherited THEIR fortune

WEDNESDAY

WE Do Not Eat Soup DAY

YOU’RE and YOUR

You’re never going to get it right unless you use YOUR head!

With credit due to Judy Parkinson, author of “i before e (except after c)”

January
14th

Wikipedia: Fact or Opinion?

Filed under: Advice for Authors and Writers — ERH @ 1:00 am

I’ve just concluded a writing assignment of a deeply technical nature.  The assignment was in two parts, first of all dealing with the need for Solvency II in the context of life insurance companies and secondly, the factors that persuaded the Massachusetts legislature to implement a mandatory universal healthcare system, the first US State to do so.

By now, you are probably thinking “What?” or yawning.  For the curious, click on the links above and they will take you to Wikipedia for a brief overview.

This assignment is not totally uncharted territory for me; I hold UK life insurance professional qualifications so grasping the general view and identifying the issues did not mean I was stumbling around in the dark. 

My research took me first of all to Google - inputting search terms that related to the topics produced the usual, incredibly long list of results and in both cases, Wikipedia was featured on the top page of my queries.

Now this is one time when you really need to question the value of an online resource such as Wikipedia.  Equally, you could be using some other voluntarily compiled reference work such as DMOZ, but my point is, you must question what you are being told by your source no matter who is providing it.

Wikipedia in this instance provided an excellent jumping off point for researching the Massachusetts healthcare legislation, and 90% is my guestimate of how much of the material presented was actually used by me to support my work.  In particular, dropping down to the references at the bottom of the listing provided a wealth of additional source material that allowed me to directly access summaries from the lawmakers themselves.  Far more valuable than the published press stories and reviews which are loaded with opinion rather than actual hard fact.

Turning to Solvency II and a new European Union Directive in the making, Wikipedia was almost next to useless.  The entry has virtually no material, within the entry or the footnotes to help with getting the facts straight for publication to a target audience of senior insurance professionals across the globe.  As I lurched around Wikipedia for more information, it became clear that some of the information that was available suffered from a very serious defect - in some instances, material was presented as factual whereas in reality, it was clearly opinion.

If you readership are looking for your work to help them reach a decision on a few billion pounds of investment and assets, be clear, they are the ones that will be exercising opinion, they are only looking to you for some facts. 

Wikipedia seeks to counter criticisms that it is not a reliable, objective source of factual information (such as Brittanica or other encyclopedias) by use of NPOV procedures for resolving opinion disputes. In Wiki jargon,  NPOV or Neutral Point of View policy requires that articles are written from an objective viewpoint with “no stand taken on the issue”.  Therein lies the rub, as many contributors are opinionated, some deliberately and some inadvertently.

NPOV disputes abound on Wikipedia, often representing nothing more than childish sibling-type rivalry. 

Wikipedia using the term “articles” for their product should also set some alarm bells ringing; articles are not encylcopedia entries.  Remember how often Michael and I, along with the rest of the article writing world advise you to be opinionated in your writing?  Don’t be fooled into believing that just because you see it in print it is in fact, correct!

Caveat Emptor is a Latin phrase which means “Buyer Beware”, and as a buyer of the information you are being sold, no matter what your research resource, always question what is being provided.

Wikipedia is a great resource, but as with everything else in life - check the small print!

January
13th

The Interminable Wait After Pitching for a Project

Filed under: Advice for Authors and Writers — ERH @ 8:14 am

Sunday morning, early awake but still in bed with the electric blanket warming the tootsies, birds twittering and some joker with a shotgun blasting away since 5am on the estate.  Why some people think rabbits, pheasants and grouse deserve to be shot at defies any explanation, but I can think of at least one person who I dearly would like to take a pot shot at … whoever the bugger is blasting away right now!

Today is supposed to be a day of rest but I have a writing test to submit for a project, or rather a contract for country profiles for an insurance directory.  I posted last week about going in for a meeting with the company in London.  I’m happy to report that I’ve made it to the last two writers, though I’m the underdog as my competitor has more relevant experience than I do.  At least the project principal is straight forward and completely open with me about the state of play. 

After the writing test is submitted, which is really a combination of research and summarising rather than whether Shelley is going to get a run for his money, it just comes down to waiting… and waiting … and of course, more waiting.

 This is the largest project I’ve bid on in my brief writing career and though it will not make me rich, it certainly will significantly boost my income to the tune of £30,000 every 18 months.  As a writing friend of mine who is also on their panel said very succinctly, “I do this because I need the money!”, and I agree with him 100%. 

One of the issues with pitching for larger projects is that I personally tend to get what I call “Big Deal’itis” where my focus is on that project to the exclusion of the rest of the work I need to be churning out and clearing.  It’s important to remember, whenever you are starting to bid on projects that otherwise may be outside your normal comfort zone, you still must continue to do the little things and maintain your standards.  Until this contract is done and dusted, it will be the little customers with their smaller projects that will be stumping up the heating bill, petrol money and paying for all the other things in life that are not free.

So, today I’ll crack out the writing test and take some time to proof and edit it to the 400 words required.  Then I’m cooking lunch for the hungry mites and planning my work schedule for the rest of the week.  If the deal comes in, fantastic but until it does it’s business as usual.

January
12th

Just for Fun - Florida Cracker Etymology

Filed under: Fun with Writing — ERH @ 6:23 pm

I’m late posting, mea culpa, so here’s something light to think about.

Michael has already written about the “history” of words and the use of language.  It’s important to always remember that every single word we speak, read and write has a history not only because the history of words is very interesting, but also to remind ourselves of how words can change their meaning depending on the social context and often implicit, common usage.

As an example, think of the word “gay” - to my grandparents, being gay meant being happy and the life of the party.  Today it means being homosexual.  A span of a couple of decades or so, or two or three generations and “WHAM!” - all meaning has changed.

I’m getting ready to head back to the United States, to my second adopted home of Florida (which is why I am late in posting) - as a Brit with a passion for history, I have always centered my spiritual leanings towards the US of A on the North Eastern seaboard and played in the “colonies” of Massachussetts, Vermont and Maine.  Florida was a destination that has only attracted me because I first ended up in hospital after an accident in Central America  over 20 years ago and thereafter, because of an unusual set of family circumstances.

Florida has a vivid colonial history.  Forget Disney and the theme parks; it is the home of the oldest private university in the US (Stetson - he of the big hat) and the home of the very first settlements that actually survived (St Augustine) and has affected the use of English in own right.  The hordes of tourists treating Florida as a surrogate Blackpool in the States simply miss out on what Florida really has to offer - so be it.

Five years ago, I happened to be in the sleepy county town of DeLand; halfway between the dross of Daytona and the glitz of Orlando.  I set up camp in Bill & Frank’s Brickhouse on Woodland Boulevard and admired the Stetson chicks (”Excuse me, but do you ever wear anything low cut and sexy?”), drank the watery beer (”No wonder you guys have to sell this stuff on a buy one get one free basis!”) and generally behaved like a reprobate. (”Karl are you really like this at home?”)

Halcyon Days!

Scott is a Florida Cracker.  His family have been there for several generations, which in terms of the US means he is a “plank owner” - his ancestors were frontiersmen and women who tamed a swamp before Mickey Mouse was invented.  He told me one evening as we made merry, the meaning of the word “Cracker” - it’s a term used to describe people who have their real, generational roots in Florida.  Cracker came from the whips used by slavemasters as the early colonisation of Florida was forcible by slaves and indentured workers.

It all sounded so plausible - except he was very wrong.

The word “Cracker” actually has a far more deeply rooted history and a far more civilised origin than slavery.

A cracker was a word used in Elizabethan times to describe a braggart - someone who was loud mouthed and full of hot air.  Shakespeare actually wrote a line or two in 1560 using the word:

“Who is this cracker that deafens us…with superfluous air.”

Before you presume that this is a typical adjective for Americans - loud and boastful, remember this is what the word meant in 1560 and not what it meant in 19th century Florida some three hundred years before America was invented.

From this Elizabethan word and meaning, the term “crack” was softened; it became a term used to describe something that was entertaining and a cracker was someone we would refer to as a racconteur today.  A purveyor of amusing anecdotes and jokes.  The Irish-English adopted the word and in Gaelic, we have the word “craic” or “craigh” - today the Irish will say “Enjoy the craic!” and in English we may say that someone “Cracked a joke”. 

The Irish-English in America were a wanton lot, drunk and bawdy, frequently moving from place to place - probably good examples of the party loving Floridians I know today.   As colonisation from the Old Country (ie the UK) headed west and south, a particular group of Irish-Scottish-English hybrids explored and lived in the sub-tropical south - Georgia and Florida.  The English colonial governors, referred to them as boastful braggarts and derogatorily called them “Crackers” in ye olde English sense of the word.  Not to be outdone, these cowboys took the sleight as a personal compliment and referred to themselves in the 19th century as “Florida Crackers” - happy, joking, jocular settlers who originally tamed Florida before mosquito screens and air conditioning.

As an aside, another good friend of mine and Florida Cracker is Junior - he has the two-man saw used to cut the wood that many of the old homes in DeLand were built with - Junior is certainly a Floridian plank owner in every sense of those words.

Clearly the word “crack” has some history behind it and words should never be taken at face value; consider how enjoying the craic means something very different in the trailer park of south Deland known as ShaDeLand; “Do you want some crack?”

Personally, I’m a Craic Head not a Crack Head so Bill & Frank - get the Hoops ready!

Next Page »